
"How long will it take?" is the first question most founders ask about a website redesign — and the most frequently misjudged. The honest answer for most SMB and startup projects is 6 to 14 weeks, with the actual number driven far more by client-side factors than agency speed.
The phase-by-phase timeline
Here's a realistic breakdown for a mid-sized redesign project (8–15 pages, custom design, CMS-managed):
| Phase | Typical duration | What happens | Client input needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Discovery | 4–7 days | Goals, audience, competitor review, sitemap draft, technical audit of current site | High — kickoff call, brief review, decision-maker alignment |
| 2. Strategy and scope | 3–5 days | Page architecture, CTA model, CMS selection, scope sign-off | High — scope must be approved before design begins |
| 3. Design (Figma) | 2–3 weeks | Wireframes → visual design → responsive mockups → prototype | Medium — 2 rounds of feedback, design approval needed |
| 4. Development | 3–5 weeks | Frontend build, CMS setup, integrations, mobile + browser QA | Low — content must be ready by week 1 of this phase |
| 5. Review and launch | 4–7 days | Final QA, content checks, performance audit, staging review, DNS switch | High — client sign-off required before go-live |
Total: 7–11 weeks for a disciplined project. Projects that reach 14+ weeks almost always do so because of delays in one predictable area.
Why projects actually run late (it's usually not the agency)
In our experience, the top 5 causes of project delays are all client-side — and they're all preventable:
- Content isn't ready when development starts. This single issue is responsible for roughly 60% of timeline extensions. Developers can't build pages around placeholder text when the actual content will change the layout. Content sign-off must happen before build begins — not during.
- Decision ownership is unclear. When multiple decision-makers have veto power and no single person has final sign-off authority, feedback rounds multiply. Define one decision-maker before the project starts.
- Scope expands mid-design. "Can we also add a resource library, a jobs page, and a client portal?" — all reasonable requests, all added after scope was agreed. Changes after design approval add weeks. Consider these in a Phase 2 instead.
- Feedback is slow. A 5-business-day turnaround on design feedback, repeated across multiple rounds, adds 2–4 weeks with no work being done in between.
- Third-party integrations are underestimated. CRM integrations, booking systems, and payment processors often require back-and-forth with a third-party support team. Budget 1–2 weeks extra per complex integration.
How to run a fast, clean redesign project
The fastest projects we've delivered shared these four characteristics:
- Content ready at kickoff. Founders who came with draft copy, existing imagery, and a clear message hierarchy let us move from design to build without waiting.
- One decision-maker with sign-off authority. No committee reviews, no additional approvals after design is agreed.
- Scope frozen after strategy phase. New ideas go into a backlog, not the current sprint. This protects the timeline without ignoring good ideas.
- Feedback within 48 hours. Fast feedback loops are the single most controllable factor in project speed — on both sides.
What about larger or more complex projects?
Large redesigns, multi-language builds, and web apps with custom logic typically run 14–24 weeks. These aren't delays — they're the correct scope for the complexity involved. If an agency quotes you 3 weeks for a 50-page site with custom integrations, that's a red flag, not a competitive advantage.
We give you a detailed scope and timeline breakdown before any commitment. Book a discovery call or see how we structure web builds.
Author

Laurynas Zilinskas
Design & Development Lead
Founder and technical lead at Anemo Agency. Specialises in conversion-focused website architecture, performance optimisation, and implementation systems for growth-stage teams.
View LinkedIn profile